Oral Presentation The International Society for Anthrozoology (ISAZ): 27th Annual Conference 2018

Children’s attitudes towards animal cruelty. (#79)

Roxanne D Hawkins 1 , Joanne M Williams 1 , Scottish SPCA 2
  1. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, United Kingdom
  2. Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Dunfermline, Fife, United Kingdom

Understanding why some children harm animals, and whether prevention is possible is imperative, yet surprisingly understudied. The lack of established and psychometrically sound measures that assess childhood animal cruelty is impeding the advancement of research on this topic. New child-friendly measures are needed to assess risk for cruelty and evaluate cruelty prevention programmes. This study describes the development of a new measure, Children’s Attitudes towards Animal Cruelty (CAAC). This study investigates associations between CAAC, socio-demographics, and variables underlying child-animal relationships, as well as assessing the validity of CAAC within an empirical quantitative study.

A questionnaire-based survey, comprising of a variety of measures relating to child-animal relationships including the new CAAC measure, was administered to primary school children during class time by school teachers. A total of 1,217 (51% boys, 49% girls) children aged 6-13 years from 24 schools across Scotland participated.

Cronbach’s alpha was 0.7. Factor analysis resulted in a three-factor solution. The three principle components were intentional animal cruelty (explaining 24.9% of the variance), unintentional animal cruelty (17.6% of the variance) and animal neglect (16.6% of the variance). The results indicate that children’s attitudes towards animal cruelty are predicted by some demographic variables including urban living, being male, younger age and not having pets, but attitudes differ depending on the type of animal cruelty. Negative attitudes, F(1,994)=9.6, p=.002, R2=.01), and lower belief in animal mind, F(1,1080)=20.2, p=.000, R2=.02), significantly predicted higher acceptance of animal cruelty. Higher acceptance of animal cruelty significantly predicted lower scores for attachment to pets, F(1,1113)=24.3, p=.000, R2=.021), compassion, F(1,1077)=14, p=.000, R2=.013), and humane behaviour, F(1,1093)=7.2, p=.006, R2=.007). Children were more accepting of unintentional animal cruelty.

The study concludes that CAAC is a coherent and psychometrically sound measure and confirms its utility in future studies to further scientific understanding of childhood animal cruelty. This measure allows for the assessment of children’s acceptance of different types of cruelty, addressing the limitations of previous research focusing on intentional acts in adult populations. This study has implications for the development and evaluation of educational interventions designed to prevent animal cruelty and neglect in the general child population.